Topic 02 · Imaging volumes · Deep dive

Four billion examinations a year: the world's imaging, counted

Humanity now performs roughly 4.2 billion medical imaging examinations annually. Plain radiography still does most of the volume, CT has doubled since 2006 and dominates the dose, and the whole enterprise is concentrated: countries holding half the world's people perform 70% of its imaging.

4.2B
medical radiologic & nuclear medicine examinations per year worldwide
UNSCEAR 2020/21 global survey
growth in global CT volume since 2006 — 220M → 403M exams/yr (55 per 1,000 people)
UNSCEAR 2020/21
−17%
change in global conventional radiography since 2006 — the only shrinking modality
UNSCEAR 2020/21
15×
variation in imaging frequency and dose across country income levels
UNSCEAR 2020/21
The global picture

What the world's 4.2 billion exams are made of

Annual volumes by modality, 2009–2018 assessment period. Radiography is the workhorse; CT is the growth engine — and, per Italy's 2023 national survey, just 14% of exams can carry 76% of the population dose.

Global annual examinations by modality

Millions of examinations per year, worldwide.
Conventional radiography2,626M / yr · 359 per 1,000 · −17% vs 2006
2,626
Dental radiography~1,100M / yr (US = 29% of total)
1,100
Computed tomography403M / yr · 55 per 1,000 · ~2× vs 2006
403
Nuclear medicine~40M / yr (US = 34% of total)
40
Interventional radiology~24M / yr · fastest-growing dose share
24
Source: UNSCEAR 2020/21 Report Annex A (assessment period 2009–2018), as summarised in Mahesh et al., Radiology 2023. Dental, nuclear-medicine and IR world totals derived from published US shares (29%, 34%, 34% respectively). Ultrasound and non-ionising imaging are outside UNSCEAR's scope — see the UK panel below.
Concentration
High- and middle-income countries hold 51% of the world's population but perform ~70% of its imaging, 90% of nuclear medicine, and receive >95% of collective dose.
The US share
One country: 18% of world CT, 34% of interventional procedures, 34% of nuclear medicine, 29% of dental radiography — on 4% of world population.
The other direction
Low-income countries perform a few dozen exams per 1,000 people per year — against ~1,400 per 1,000 in Italy. Most of the world's imaging gap is volume that simply never happens.
Computed tomography

CT: the modality that ate radiology

Country-level utilisation spans roughly five-fold among rich countries alone — and the world average sits far below all of them.

CT examinations per 1,000 population

Latest available national figures (2016–2023; bases differ).
South Korea2020
250
United States2016 · 74M exams (93M by 2023)
230
Luxembourg2016
211
Italy2023 national survey
207
Austria2019–21, age-adjusted
196
OECD averagelatest years
162
Canada2022–23, public only
160
Australia2019–21, age-adjusted
151
World averageUNSCEAR 2009–2018
55
Sources: OECD Health Statistics (via Fraser Institute 2023, age-adjusted 2019–21); NCRP 184 (US 2016); Smith-Bindman et al. JAMA IM 2025 / IMV (US 2023); Eur Radiol (Luxembourg); Health Physics 2025 (Italy); CADTH (Canada, public only); UNSCEAR (world).

The US CT curve, 1998–2023

Annual examinations, millions.
1998
26M
2006multidetector era
62M
2010peak of first wave
85M
2016plateau
74M
202393M exams in 62M patients
93M
Sources: NCRP 184 historical series; Smith-Bindman et al., JAMA Internal Medicine 2025 (IMV survey). The 2023 figure implies ~275 exams per 1,000 — and a projected ~103,000 future cancers from one year of scanning, per the same study.

MRI examinations per 1,000 population

A 3.6× spread across reporting European countries.
Austria2019–21, age-adjusted
148
France2020
123
Luxembourg2016
83
Australia2019–21, age-adjusted
55
Poland2020
41
Sources: OECD Health Statistics via Fraser Institute (age-adjusted) and Martella et al. 2023. MRI reporting coverage is thinner than CT; several large systems (incl. Japan) publish no comparable figure.
Ultrasound & the modality mix

The uncounted workhorse

No global body counts ultrasound — it is non-ionising, so UNSCEAR excludes it, and OECD coverage is patchy. The best window is national administrative data. England's is exceptionally clean:

England: one month of NHS diagnostic imaging, January 2026

Share of diagnostic-test activity by modality (imaging tests shown; ~2.5M tests/month total).
Ultrasound (non-obstetric)752,866 exams · 31% of activity
31%
CT784,561 exams · 30%
30%
MRI420,436 exams · 17%
17%
All other testsaudiology, endoscopy, etc. · 22%
22%
Source: NHS England monthly diagnostics data via Nuffield Trust. Annualised, England alone performs ~9M ultrasounds, ~9.4M CTs and ~5M MRIs. Ultrasound matches CT for volume — with none of CT's dose and a fraction of its unit cost.
The reference table

Country ladder, both modalities

CountryCT / 1,000MRI / 1,000Year & basisSource
South Korea~2502020, national dataOECD via KSEM literature
United States2302016 (93M CT exams by 2023 ≈ 275/1,000)NCRP 184 · JAMA IM 2025 / IMV
Luxembourg211832016Eur Radiol national audit
Italy2072023 national dose survey (1,443 total exams/1,000)Health Physics 2025
Austria1961482019–2021, age-adjustedOECD via Fraser Institute
OECD average162latest available yearsCADTH / OECD
Canada1602022–23, publicly funded onlyCADTH CMII
Australia151552019–2021, age-adjustedOECD via Fraser Institute
France1232020OECD via Martella et al.
Poland412020OECD via Martella et al.
World average552009–2018 assessment periodUNSCEAR 2020/21

Countries count exams differently (encounters vs body regions; public-only vs total; age-adjusted vs crude), and years differ — read as tiers, not league-table decimals. Japan reports the world's densest scanner fleet but does not publish comparable national exam counts; a 2008 survey estimated ~235 CT patients per 1,000.

Radiography shrinks, CT compounds

The single most important structural fact in imaging volumes is the crossover in what the world scans. Conventional radiography — still the majority of all examinations — has fallen 17% globally since 2006, as GI fluoroscopy and urography collapse into cross-sectional alternatives. CT has gone the other way, doubling to 403 million examinations a year. Because a CT delivers on the order of a hundred times the dose and several times the reading effort of a radiograph, the workload and dose burden of world imaging is rising much faster than raw exam counts suggest. Italy's 2023 national survey states it precisely: CT was 14.4% of examinations and 75.7% of the population dose.

Rich-world variation is about habits, not need

Among high-income countries CT utilisation spans nearly five-fold — South Korea near 250 exams per 1,000 people, Austria near 200, Australia at 151 — with no plausible epidemiological difference to explain it. Luxembourg's own national audit found only 61% of its CT requests appropriate against referral guidelines, in one of Europe's highest-utilisation systems. The MRI spread is similar (Austria 148 vs Poland 41). Utilisation reflects payment systems, gatekeeping, scanner access and medico-legal culture far more than disease burden — which is why "more imaging" and "better access" must never be read as synonyms.

The volume that never happens

The global average of 55 CT exams per 1,000 people is not a midpoint between rich countries — it is a number dragged down by billions of people who are scarcely imaged at all. Countries holding half the world's population perform 70% of its examinations and essentially all of its nuclear medicine; UNSCEAR measures a 15-fold spread in frequency across income levels. Set against the workforce map on our front page, the two gaps compound: the places with the fewest radiologists also generate the fewest images for them to read, so the true diagnostic deficit is far larger than either number alone implies.

And everywhere, exams outrun machines and readers

Across 16 OECD countries, the exam-to-scanner ratio rose for CT, MRI and PET in the large majority between 2011 and 2020 — the same fleets worked ever harder. The UK quantifies the human side: CT/MRI reporting demand growing 8–11% a year against roughly half that in workforce growth. The US CT curve — 26M exams in 1998, 93M in 2023 — is the whole story in one series: volume growth is the engine behind every other page on this site, from waits to burnout to the economics of reimbursement.

On the data. UNSCEAR's global assessment aggregates national submissions of very uneven quality across 2009–2018 and excludes ultrasound and MRI (non-ionising). OECD "exams" definitions vary by country (encounters vs body regions; public-only in Canada; age-adjusted in the Fraser compilation), and years span 2016–2023. Dental, nuclear-medicine and IR world totals are back-derived from published US shares and rounded. Within-country trends are more reliable than cross-country levels; treat every ladder here as tiers.

Sources

  1. Mahesh M et al. Patient Exposure from Radiologic and Nuclear Medicine Procedures in the US and Worldwide, Radiology 2023 (NCRP 184 + UNSCEAR 2020/21 synthesis)
  2. UNSCEAR 2020/21 Report Annex A summary — global medical exposure
  3. Smith-Bindman et al., JAMA Internal Medicine 2025 — 93M US CT exams (IMV) and projected cancer burden
  4. Fraser Institute 2023 — OECD age-adjusted CT/MRI utilisation table
  5. Martella M et al. — Diagnostic technology trends, 16 OECD countries 2011–2020
  6. Italy national survey 2023 — Health Physics
  7. Luxembourg national CT/MRI appropriateness audit — Eur Radiol
  8. CADTH Canadian Medical Imaging Inventory 2022–23
  9. NHS England diagnostics via Nuffield Trust — modality mix
  10. Japan CT exposure survey (2008) — BMC